Opinion

Opinion: Daily Mail takedown of BLM protesters is a one-sided hit piece

By September 7, 2020 7 Comments

(Current Photo by Ed Thompson)

By Charlie Deitch
Pittsburgh Current Editor
charlie@pittsburghcurrent.com

On Sunday morning, the United Kingdom’s conservative newspaper, Daily Mail, posted a story about Black Lives Matter protests under the headline: “Black Lives Matter protesters screamed in the face of white elderly outdoor diners during protests in Pittsburgh on Saturday, disturbing new video shows.” 

However, photojournalist Ed Thompson was on assignment for the Pittsburgh Current says the Mail’s account of the incident isn’t at all a fair representation. 

As a media company, The Daily Mail is often recognized as one of the most unreliable news sources. So much so in fact, that in 2017, Wikipedia banned the paper as a source due to its consistent unreliability, saying it “mastered the art of running stories that aren’t true.” 

The Mail’s account of events focused on a video posted on Facebook, tweets from “outraged” witnesses. The article painted the protesters in Pittsburgh and other places around the country as the aggressors in these instances. In particular, the paper pointed to the case of an “elderly diner,” pictured below in the green shirt.

 

(Current Photo by Ed Thompson)

But Thompson says that’s not the case. “The older lady was the aggressor,” Thompson said. “She called [protesters] out and called them names. Here is Thompson’s tweet from the protest.

When there are confrontations at events like this, more often than not, protesters are the ones blamed. The Daily Mail didn’t report on the aggressive actions of white “bystanders.” 

At the same march this past Saturday, Thompson photographed a white man who was taken away by police for turning violent against a protester with an attempt at a Karate Kid Crane Kick. We have reached out to Pittsburgh Police to see if any charges were filed or if an investigation was ongoing in this incident. Update: A Pittsburgh Police spokesperson says the incident is being investigated but no arrests have been made.

(Current Photo by Ed Thompson)

 

While the Mail may have been first in reporting a version of events downtown, it was not the last. Locally, WTAE has picked it up as has Fox News and the New York Post. 

But all of the reports have one very glaring similarity — not one of these news agencies had a reporter on the scene. 

All reported that Pittsburgh Police were investigating the matter, however, no one attempted to get the side of a protester or anyone else for that matter.

In contrast, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette also covered the story, but unlike the other publications sought out and talked to protesters who were at the scene, which is what you’re supposed to do in these situations.

For our part, Thompson was there on assignment. He’s a seasoned photojournalist and I trust his account of what happened. If Thompson weren’t there, I wouldn’t be writing anything today because I didn’t have a representative there to view what happened.  And that’s a huge problem. Today, more and more journalists are relying on social media to do their jobs for them. I’m not saying you can’t write about something if you weren’t there, but then you must do extra due diligence and interview as many witnesses to the event as possible.

There are journalists in this city, some well-known, that base the majority of their reporting on other people’s social media with, at times, little to no independent collaboration. Or, they “quote” other news sources who were there or who did the actual legwork to get a story. If I don’t have solid information and verification on a story, I don’t write it, just to say that I have a major story, too. 

The most important thing that a reporter can do is see and report. 

It shouldn’t be about clickbait headlines and that’s what the Daily Mail did here. And now other media, especially right-wing news outlets, will take this report and use it to fit the narrative and agenda that they are pushing. That’s how fake news is born. If other apparently “legitimate” news companies run a piece too, then it must be true.

Honestly, I probably wouldn’t have written anything about this today because a lot of times, the worst thing you can do is spread stuff like this and lend it legitimacy. However, we saw facts on Saturday that disputed the narrative pushed by the Daily Mail; and if we didn’t do that, we wouldn’t be doing our jobs.

 

 

7 Comments

  • Lisa says:

    It’s clear from all the footage from your reporter that these rogue protesters were terrorizing people which is ruining the real movement.

  • Rick Sanchez says:

    Dude, you are either delusional, or just a bold face liar. We can see the video. While we can’t hear what the old lady is saying, there is no justification for the “protester’s” behavior whatsoever. It amazes me that the protesters somehow think they are morally superior to everyone else. It’s embarrassing as a country that so many people are acting like spoiled children. History will no look kindly towards those people. Or for that matter, people like you who are encouraging it to happen. I can’t even count any longer how many times I’ve seen elderly people being assaulted/cursed at/yelled at.

  • Jasn says:

    LOL, are you seriously posting pictures of the guy who got his beer taken and drank in front of him as if it was a conversation? This is deliberate horseshit.

  • Norma says:

    The movement is being co-opted by a bunch of either crazy anarchists or republican infiltrators. They need to be strongly repudiated by the majority of peaceful protestors. If Trump wins PA by a slim margin, we can trace it back to this video.

  • Mike Hunt says:

    Find it hard to believe an elderly woman would be the aggressor In the face of all the protestors.

  • Tom Juring says:

    Early on during the protest the manager of the McDonalds was upset because he was losing business due to the blockage of traffic. Word got out to those in attendance and many came into the store to buy some food and drink in response to the manager’s concerns. For the times I have been to the civil Saturdays the protestors have been peaceful and non-violent. The few disruptions I’ve seen have been initiated by anti-protesters trying to raise hell and cause trouble. I am an old white guy, moderately conservative, who after watching Mr. Floyd get murdered on TV for eight minutes, thinks these protests are important.

    • Johnny Truth says:

      Nobody takes you seriously when you add irrelevant comments like ” I am an old white guy”. Why would that give anything you say any addition weight?

      We all saw the youtube videos of these “peaceful protestors” going up to people just trying to enjoy dinner and screaming in their cases and in at least once case touching their food and drink.

      I guess it’s a good the “Party of Science” told us you can’t catch the Shanghai Shivers while protesting, otherwise I’d be pretty concerned about this behavior.

Leave a Reply

Pin It on Pinterest